Posts Tagged ‘Wall Street Journal’


BurrellesLuce Newsletter: Digital Overload – How to Boost Productivity and Eliminate Burnout

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Working Hard resizeWhether we like it or not, we’re continuously inundated with emails, status updates, mobile text, and videos, among numerous types of messages. Perhaps we’re even bombarding others with messages of our own. After all, that is the nature of the digital beast, or so it seems. And as communications professionals, it’s our job to be right there with it.

But we may be paying a steep price to operate in a state of constant contact. As journalist and author John Freeman has cautioned in this Wall Street Journal essay, “The faster we talk and chat and type over tools such as email and text messages, the more our communication will resemble traveling at great speed. Bumped and jostled, queasy from the constant ocular and muscular adjustments our body must make to keep up, we will live in a constant state of digital jet lag.”

As PR practitioners, how can we keep from burning out and, at the same time, ensure that our messages aren’t merely adding to the digital fatigue?

Discover 10 ways to lessen the load of lightning-fast communication by visiting the BurrellesLuce Resource Center.

  • Share/Bookmark

Taking A Step Back: Reflecting On Your PR Career

Monday, April 26th, 2010

by Colleen Flood*

I received an email from my cousin Maureen last week requesting a favor.  Her girls, my first cousins once removed and who happen to be triplets, are working on a Girl Scout project related to public relations. Maureen, the leader of the troop, asked if I could provide some information to them about my job at BurrellesLuce and public relations in general. Any information I could provide would be a starting point for them to understand the industry.  Then, on their own, they would do further research in order to complete the project, such as obtaining

Flickr Image: HckySo

Flickr Image: HckySo

press releases, creating a press kit, role-playing how to handle bad publicity, creating a sales pitch, being a spokesperson for a non-profit, using technology, etc.

Naturally I thought this was great! My 13 year old cousins are learning about the PR industry, a field many adults don’t even grasp. David Mullen addressed this in his blog “How Do You Explain PR to People?” He states:

“I help companies communicate with people – customers, employees, legislators. And with you! If you’ve read a story in a newspaper or on CNN.com on a new product, a PR pro shared that with the reporter and lined up the interviews. If you see a business leader delivering a speech, a PR pro probably wrote it. If you happen across a really cool event in Bryant Park, a PR pro likely played a major part in the idea behind it. We work with executives to figure out the smartest, most effective ways to engage with people, let them know what’s going on with the company, and get their thoughts and feedback.”  

A great explanation from David, but my cousins had more questions… As I began to answer the list they sent me, I also reflected on my own career.  How I got into it, what I love about it, and how much experience I have gained over the years. I have included a few samples of the questions (and my answers) which I really enjoyed thinking about.

1.  What is your favorite part of your job? My favorite part is helping my clients do their job better. Also, attending social events is fun, too, and I have even met a few famous journalists. I attended a luncheon with Katie Couric! I also belong to professional organizations such as New York Women in Communications, The Public Relations Society of America, and The Publicity Club of New York.

2.  What type of training and experience did you need?  Since I work with clients in the public relations industry, I need to have an understanding of media and journalism. I was also trained on how my company monitors the media – for print and online news and magazine articles, social media, video and blogs, and more. 

3.  Do you still learn on the job?  Yes, especially now since media is changing and incorporating both traditional print media and online media.

4.  What type of companies does your company work for? Describe your customers. My company works with anyone or any company who needs to know where and when they are mentioned in the media. I specifically work with public relations agencies. These are firms who do PR for clients who hire them. They often specialize in a certain industry like fashion, beauty, toys or travel. My specific clients are located in New York City and New Jersey.

5.  What is the most interesting thing that you’ve learned or done in your job? There are so many interesting things I have done and learned during my career. I have been able to travel to meet clients, attend networking functions (one I went to was on board the U.S.S. Intrepid in San Diego!) It has also been rewarding to manage, train, and mentor others on all I have learned throughout my career. I enjoy the fact that I work with smaller clients, as well as  with big name clients and can build personal relationships with both. 

6.  How do you use technology in your job?  I think the coolest technology we use is this system that scans thousands of newspapers and magazines to find client product names or keywords. However, we still use humans to make sure the keyword is really what the client is looking for. We also use technology to deliver results to our clients.

7.  What are you most proud of in your career?  The loyal, strong relationships I have made with my clients.  

How would you answer these questions about your career? 

***

*Bio: Colleen Flood has been a sales consultant with BurrellesLuce for over 12 years and is eager to become a more integrated part of the social-public relations community. She primarily handles agency relations in the New York and New Jersey metro-area. She is not only passionate about work, but also about family, friends, and the Jersey Shore. Twitter: @cgflood LinkedIn: Colleen Flood Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

The Stork Does Not Deliver Free News

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

2471070389_b237c7bf1e_m.jpg

Steve Shannon

Bravo to Rupert Murdoch for having the guts to say and do what others in the media industry have been wringing their hands over for quite some time: “We intend to charge for all our news websites…If we are successful, we’ll be followed by all media.”

Naturally, and as expected, many of the folks I follow on Twitter and in my Google Reader all piled onto poor Rupert. The worst of the comments: he’s an old man who doesn’t understand that Internet news yearns to be free, yada, yada, yada.

Here’s what I do know about Mr. Murdoch: he bought the Wall Street Journal and kept it on a subscription basis, despite the fact that even he stated he’d remove the subscription wall. I also know that Mr. Murdoch is one very clever businessman who has built a behemoth of a business empire. Who is anybody to question him? Clearly, he’s learned something from the Wall Street Journal and he’s going to put that lesson to work in his other media properties.

Murdoch’s critics point out that if his properties enact a subscription wall around their content they’ll lose audience. To that I would say, and I’m sure Murdoch is too, SO WHAT? What does any media outlet get by giving its content away for free? Next to nothing. It’s a well known fact that online advertising is not a workable model so what does News Corporation, or any other online media outlet, have to lose by asking people to pay for and value the content? Right now, traditional media is taking it on the chin financially. They can either die a slow death by staying with the free model, or show some guts, as apparently Murdoch is going to do, and rightfully charge for their valuable content. They may die faster, but on the other hand they may find the revenue model that WILL work.

Another specious argument is that by enacting pay walls around their content, media properties will lose their link love from the likes of Google and other search. To that I say, who needs it? Nobody goes searching for news; they want it pushed to them. Many claim that they now get their news via Twitter.  But how? By people who are quoting and linking to news that is reported by traditional media!

Too many folks have chugged the Internet Kool-Aid and are confusing medium with the product. In terms of the media industry, the Internet is still nascent, and media is still finding it’s footing, albeit not as fast as other industries. Whether journalism and news are in print or online, that doesn’t matter; the people producing it need to make money. And that’s the bottom line on this issue. My bet is on Murdoch and that subscriptions will definitely be a part of the equation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Measuring Business Results Will Get You Noticed

Friday, July 31st, 2009

2727298487_accc60a355_m.jpg

Are you tracking and/or analyzing your media coverage? Are you sharing your results? If you said “no” to one of these questions you could be in trouble – your existing employer may not understand the value you bring to the organization. Clearly, in this economy, it’s best to be proactive.

A friend who’s been looking for a Senior Communicator position for four months (he will face final “liberation” from his current position the end of next week) asked me to review his resume. His company was acquired and all administrative functions are being absorbed by the larger entity. He’s had his resume on job boards and with companies in his industry of expertise for more than three months with not so much as a nibble. I was shocked when I reviewed his resume and found no mention of the analysis program and the key results I know he’s gathered and correlated. When we discussed this omission, he expressed to me he planned to “cover that in the interview.” I advised him that he’d be hard pressed to get an interview if he’s not talking about how he can show value to an organization.

Begrudgingly, he deleted his “love of mountain biking and other interests” to make room for an overview of the program he manages and the impact on sales in his organization. Within 48 hours of the update, he received three inquiries on his resume. One resulted in an interview, with his second interview today. He let me know his second interview is almost solely due to the measurement program he implemented since the prospective company is interested in applying a similar program. Granted, there are some resume “optimization” factors at work in this example, but for his prospective new employer, measurement matters!

This situation reminded me of a session I attended by Smooch Reynolds, The Repovich Reynolds Group, at the PRSA Western District Conference, where she addressed the value of “A” players and how there will always be a demand for them. Well, my friend is an “A” player. He just needed to be reminded to wave his “measurement flag” and get noticed. For all the job seekers – and there are a lot of you out there – another interesting read is the Wall Street Journal article on organizations giving preferential treatment to candidates already employed. Perhaps, if you aren’t currently employed, showing solid results from previous positions with supporting metrics may be the next best thing.

The bottom line: Individuals fighting to be relevant must understand how their communication/public relations efforts affect the organization’s bottom-line results, because this ability will always be in demand. I challenge each of you to uncover your “A” game and identify how your efforts contribute to your organization’s success. Let your “measurement flag” wave!

*If you are faced with implementing your own program please contact me jburke@burrellesluce.com and I will send you a copy of the BurrellesLuce Quality Rating System (QRS) “scorecard” to help get you started.

  • Share/Bookmark

Can the Average Net-User Rationalize Paying for News Content?

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

Steve Shannon
Copyright The May 11th edition of the Wall Street Journal contained a very interesting op-ed by author Mark Helprin, “Copyright Critics Rationalize Theft.” In the piece, he discusses how opponents of copyright make various specious arguments that copyright stifles creativity, commerce, freedom and then he deftly points out how they are, of course, wrong.

Without copyright protections, creators of original works would have little financial incentive to create them; thus, there would be less of the very things challengers claim copyright inhibits. Think about how many books, articles, websites, songs, software, and movies wouldn’t exist if their creators weren’t able to make their living doing so.

Helprin’s points also collide with an emerging issue affecting the news media, newspapers in particular:  How will they profit from their creative works published online, which they currently give away for free, when they are not earning enough revenue from a failed ad-supported model? Publishers may look to a system of micropayments and/or “passes” (read: subscriptions) that will charge users to view articles. So, to riff on the title of Helprin’s piece, can the average net-user rationalize paying for news content?

My prediction is that we’ll see a many folks adopt this model right away. The first group is the same “influentials” and “heavy news consumers” who now read the paper version of publications. This group includes me, and I pay $40 a month to have The New York Times chucked in my driveway every day. I’d gladly pay the same to access its great content online, especially if the print edition went away. 

Then there is a second group consisting of “media snackers,” who only consume content from outlets such as The Washington Post, online.  The Washington Post has a print circulation of 665,000 but draws 9.4 million unique visitors to its site each month. Those 9.4 million don’t all live in the D.C. area, and their browsing clearly shows they value something about the original content. (I’m a D.C. area native and I keep up on the region everyday on washingtonpost.com, so I certainly see the appeal.)

Assuming a print subscription to The Washington Post also costs $40 per month, those 9.4 million unique visitors would each need to pay $2.83 per month to equal the subscription revenues the paper gets for its print edition. That’s less than 10 cents per day in any given month. Of course, not all 9.4 million will pony up, but you get my point.

That’s where the micropayment model would work. Want to read one article on a newspaper site that you found through search?  Pay 99 cents.  Prefer to get a pass to let you read as many articles as you wish for a month? Pay six bucks. Want a pass to a consortium of sites? I’m sure that will exist as well.

If you think about it, the vast majority of creative journalism these days is still being driven by traditional media for their ad-supported print edition, and posted online, mostly for free. As revenues associated with the print mode of delivery decline, publishers will need to make up that revenue or go out of business. Like it or not, net-users will have to rationalize paying for content. It may be a micropayment model I’ve outlined above, or some other model, but they will have to pay. There is no such thing as a free lunch (or journalism).

Would you pay for online content? Share your thoughts with us here at BurrellesLuce.

  • Share/Bookmark