Posts Tagged ‘transparency’


Are You Paying for Word-of-Mouth Marketing?

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

by Crystal deGoede*

There are a lot of us that follow people on Twitter whom we have never met or heard of just because everyone else is following them. “They” must have something good to say, right? We should trust them. Or we like a brand on Facebook just because they are giving away an iPad, or friend someone from high school merely to see their photos. Yet, we never even talked to them – then or now.  (I know people that have over 2,000 friends on Facebook…come on. That number might be ok for Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. because we are “networking” with peers and colleagues, but these Facebook accounts are mostly personal.)  

In reality, we all are just building our personal brand. In fact, regardless of the Are You Paying for Word-of-Mouth Marketing?network, these people may not really be our “friends” or even acknowledge our tweets but when we update our status or link to an interesting article, they are seeing it and vice versa.  Our own word-of-mouth marketing is taking place with every post, generating a buzz for ourselves, company, brand or clients.

Since the 1980s, when word-of-mouth marketing became the big craze, the continuing efforts of companies trying to create a buzz, by having people endorse their products, has increased. And with social media, it is easier than ever. All marketers know that the ability to generate word-of-mouth advertising is not something that can be purchased, or so they’ve been taught.

However, that may no longer be the case. Celebrities, along with other influencers are receiving compensation to tweet and blog, mentioning certain products to their millions of followers. Can you imagine getting paid $10,000 just to tweet?

Sponsored Tweets, a new Twitter advertising platform, connects advertisers with twitter users. Advertisers can create sponsored conversations on Twitter. Tweeters can earn money for spreading the word. Along with advertising on Twitter, the company also has a sister site Pay-Per-Post, which pays influencers to blog about certain products. Currently they have 400,000 participating bloggers and tweeters, and over 40,000 advertisers.

Besides paying people to tweet and generate a buzz around your brand, you can also gain followers or friends by simply buying them. One way to gain “fake,” “targeted” friends is Twitter1k, which offers several options for the quantity of followers. If you need Facebook friends/fans, well you can buy them too. (Interestingly enough, the use of such friending or advertising services could potentially get you banned from a given social network – though some claim that they are less likely to do so then their competitors - unless of course you are using a service affiliated with the network. Then it seems to be more “ok.” Go figure.)

Why are companies doing this? Well most of us trust a brand that has a higher number of followers, fans, and YouTube views. If a brand has this, many “friends” and most of those friends are speaking positively about them, then we assume they must be engaging or influencing.  We are also more likely to recommed the brands (personal or business) that have lots of friends and followers.  Those artificial friends that are doing your word-of-mouth advertising have real friends that trust them, and that allows your brand to reach different verticals without much effort. Therefore, for some marketers, the incentive to fallaciously drive-up those numbers is very attractive.

If you found out that a brand you trusted had paid for their followers or for praise from someone that doesn’t even use their products or service, how would you feel? Does the ability to buy friends or pay people to be brand ambassadors go against the etiquette for transparency in social media? How does that reflect on the brands and companies who legitimately build their following, slow and steady, over time? Would you ever consider purchasing friends and followers for your brand? Share your thoughts with BurrellesLuce and our authentic Fresh Idea readers. 

***

*Bio: After graduating from East Carolina University with a Marketing degree in 2005, Crystal DeGoede moved to New Jersey. In her four years as a member of the BurrellesLuce marketing team and through her interaction with peers and clients she has learned what is important or what it takes to develop a career when you are just starting out. She is passionate about continuing to learn about the industry in which we serve and about her career path. By engaging readers on Fresh Ideas Crystal hopes to further develop her social media skills and inspire other “millennials” who are just out of college and/or working in the field of marketing and public relations. Twitter: @cldegoede LinkedIn: Crystal DeGoede Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Getting “Lost” in Social Media Means Living and Dancing Together

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

by Emily Mouyeos*

Image: ABC
Image: ABC

Being a huge LOST fan, I was completely dialed into the finale, processing every detail and scenario that played out in the past six seasons. One thing that sticks out most to me is the mantra from the character, Jack in the first season: “Live together; die alone.” I’ve been thinking about this idea and the importance of community in both our personal and professional lives.

I think it goes without saying that it is impossible to do business “alone.” We should not be put off by the fact that people have an agenda because everyone has an agenda and varying motivations. However, there is a dance that we participate in together and that dance has to do with creating and maintaining healthy relationships. You have to learn the steps so you’re successful in these business relationships. Just like the lines of one of my favorite country songs by John Michael Montgomery, “Life is a dance, you learn as you go, sometimes you lead and sometimes you follow.” Learning to balance give and take is key!

I love how Twitter mirrors this idea. Twitter can be used solely as a platform to amplify announcements or deals. But Twitter also teaches us the basics of building relations in a simple way, so that we are “living together.” We can reap the benefits of Twitter as well as help others succeed, if we follow the steps or “rules of social media” that have been organically instated. And who doesn’t feel good about that! Let’s take a look at some of these rules and see how they guide our business relationships on a broader scale.

  • Be transparent. As already stated, everyone has an agenda. I can respect someone who clearly states their intentions, but if I don’t know what they are up to then I don’t trust them. People want to be in a relationship – whether online or off – with people they trust. If you can’t be transparent then you’re probably not being ethical. It is possible to be both strategic and transparent at the same time. Transparency may even be your strategy. (It’s a good strategy these days!)
  • Engage and add value. I think every story I’ve read regarding social media lately is drenched in the word “engagement.” People like to connect with smart, insightful people. Potential clients will be more likely to work with you if they feel you are truly an expert in the field.
  • Talk human. Don’t be afraid to show some personality. Plainly said, potential clients want to work with people they like and can relate to. If you sound like you are reading a sales pitch or press release there isn’t much personal appeal. In my opinion, Eric Mower and Associates provides one example of using “talking human” on their homepage as a strategy for branding and business relations.
  • Share the love. If someone is providing great information and thought-provoking commentary, share it! Practice the, “Pat my back and I’ll pat your back” mentality. It may seem selfish but it’s just smart. But remember you become a problem and detriment to yourself when you become self-absorbed. Acting selfishly will cause you to “die alone” professionally and personally too. So go ahead and share the love!

Have you found that Twitter is helping your business relationship building skills? Have you learned other lessons from Twitter regarding making solid connections with potential clients or colleagues? Please share your thoughts with me and the readers of BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas.

***

*Bio: Emily Mouyeos joined the BurrellesLuce account management team with a background in nonprofit communication and development. Her background and current experience with BurrellesLuce allows her to effectively address client needs and consolidate feedback for senior management. To Emily, nothing feels better than helping others achieve their goal, whether it’s professionally or personally.  By focusing on client management through the Fresh Ideas blog, she hopes to evaluate new client management trends, as well as provide insight to the pros and cons of current practices. She looks forward to connecting with the readers of Fresh Ideas for new perspectives and dialogue on issues that affect overall success. LinkedIn: Emily Mouyeos Twitter: @BurrellesLuce Facebook: BurrellesLuce

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Is It Possible To Be Blinded By Transparency?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Valerie Simon

698692268_b31d429272While I have always been a big believer in transparency in social media, a recent experience gave me reason to reconsider.

I had been tweeting with @Journalistics for a while. Rather than a photo, @journalistics has a cool “J” logo.  We had been exchanging numerous ideas and at some point, even began sharing our challenges balancing work and life. I have a toddler and an infant and when I learned that @journalistics has an infant, toddler, and a four year old, and still finds time to blog. I felt an immediate kinship… @journalistics was intelligent, busy and thoughtful… the type of mom I aspired to be!

Then @journalistics sent me a Facebook invite. With his picture. Yes, his picture! As I looked back on his tweets, I realized that any of his comments could have been made by my husband, or several of the men I work with at BurrellesLuce; caring, involved fathers who work hard to balance parenting and a career. But without a picture, I had made an assumption that he was a mom, and was happily tweeting a way with my new “girlfriend.”

Without a “face” I had unintentionally, created a persona. What if we had not begun attaching photographs to our virtual profiles? Could we have created a universe where we might all communicate without any bias? No gender issues, ageism or other disruptive stereotypes to block the free flow of ideas? Would our messages be received differently if they came through in their purest form?

Social media provides us with a new universe in which we can exchange information and while I fully subscribe to the theory of authenticity, I can’t help but wonder if we would all hear a little more, if we saw a little less.

Do you think that using a photo is a useful part a social media profile or does it simply distract from the message?

  • Share/Bookmark

Measuring Integrity in Media-Journalism

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

Steve Shannon
An interesting story I read about Dubai on nytimes.com last week intersected with a presentation that was given at the Institute for Public Relations Summit on Measurement this past fall in Portsmouth, NH.

While my travel schedule prohibited my attendance of the Summit’s last presentation, it did have an interesting title that made me wish I could have heard it: “The Significance of the Role of Journalism Integrity in Measurement.”  The presentation was delivered by Mazen Nahawi, President of Media Watch Middle East, a media monitoring firm headquartered in Dubai.

In the New York Times piece, about the falling economy of Dubai, the real state of the country’s economy, and the rumors that surround it, it was stated that “Instead of moving toward greater transparency, the emirates seem to be moving in the other direction. A new draft media law would make it a crime to damage the country’s reputation or economy, punishable by fines of up to 1 million dirhams (about $272,000). Some say it is already having a chilling effect on reporting about the crisis.”

Now I can see where Nahawi had the genesis of his presentation.  While we here in the States, with our robust First Amendment, would never see such a law proposed, much less enacted, Nahawi’s suggestion that we begin to score for “integrity” still takes on importance as the U.S. media begins to pull itself together, not only in terms of an evolving business landscape, but also of  building and keeping “trust” as indicated by the Edelman Trust barometer as detailed by Richard Edelman on his 6AM blog (disclosure: BurrellesLuce client).

With trust, or integrity, in a particular media source being defined more and more by the individual consumer/reader/viewer, and not mass distribution or mass audience, the challenges ahead for public relations will also include analyzing the credibility of sources more often than before, and likely will be somewhat unique to the client or organization rather than the trust or integrity conferred upon mainstream media of the past.  What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark