Posts Tagged ‘qualitative analysis’


Good PR Measurement Is All About Good Goal Setting

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Leah Schmerl is a senior vice president at Kaplow, a New York City public relations firm. She is the leader of the firm’s Internet and e-commerce practice. Leah also spearheads Kaplow’s measurement thought-leadership and oversees the development of the agency’s measurement programs. Leah earned her Master’s degree in U.S. History from the University of California, San Diego, and is a magna cum laude graduate of the University of Rochester.

 

Last week, I had the pleasure of attending the PR News PR Measurement Conference, and grappling with some of the toughest issues the PR industry faces.

In my mind, the fundamental question that united the day: how do we make sure the decision-makers within our organizations understand the PRNews Measurement Conference 2010value public relations brings to their businesses? The speakers who asked and answered these questions were brilliant and the attendees thoughtful.

Here’s my biggest “a-ha” related to the day: when presenting PR results to the C-suite, we need to “talk the talk” of those executives. Meaning, we need to make PR results relevant to the issues and concerns most critical to them.

To do that well, we must fully understand the business objectives against which executives hold PR accountable. Stop being preoccupied with delivering the fanciest metrics on the block (“marketing mix modeling” or “weighted media costs” at the end of the program. The best investment of time and resources is spent at the very start of the PR planning process. This time should be spent clearly articulating the relevant business objectives, and creating clear, measurable PR goals that map to those business objectives. If that’s done at the outset, good measurement becomes so much easier. And our results will be the kinds that make the C-suite sit up and take notice.

Another great take-away from the day: PR has many illustrative metrics available that make setting PR goals (and delivering the corresponding results) much more impactful than ever. It’s critical to examine the measurement tools available (quantitative and qualitative) and hand-pick the ones that will best “make the case” for the positive impact of PR on the organization’s specific business. This reinforced my belief that PR cannot live in a silo. We need to access the metrics available from other teams – like sales and marketing – to help us create the richest measurement reporting possible.

I left the day feeling inspired by the work my PR colleagues are doing in measurement. We’re facing some of the industry’s most challenging times. We’ve got some really smart people asking (and answering) tough questions. I’m excited by where we’re headed.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Alert Users: Are You Getting What Google’s Not Paying For?

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Twitter was so abuzz with discussion about Google and fair use of AP content that I couldn’t resist riffing off yesterday’s post by BurrellesLuce Executive Vice President Steve Shannon regarding AP copyright discussions.

The graphic below shows tweet results for the terms “Google,” “AP,” “Copyright,” “NAA” (Newspaper Association of America) and “ACAP” (Automated Content Access Protocol). If one were to review quantitative share of conversation yielded by this graph you would think Google “owns” the conversation; however a qualitative look into these conversations shows if Google were to engage in a “pay-per-click” micro-payment system for copyrighted content, the search giant risks being abandoned by some searchers.

twittergraph31.jpg

If public relations teaches us anything it’s that huge fires can be started by a small spark. This graphic also demonstrates that the metrics produced the fastest and easiest often tell only part of the story.

Google has already found it’s difficult to monetize social media (e.g. purchase of YouTube) and may experience some bumps in their upward trajectory if micro-payment of copyrighted content takes hold. This situation will continue to evolve and Internet users will be watching closely to protect the free search.

I’m left thinking this is one more reason to protect the free press and investigative journalism that could provide in-depth reporting on this very important issue. Is this the tipping point showing the importance of getting the estimated 15K-20K trained reporters back to work? While micro-blogging grows increasingly popular, my guess is micro-payments won’t be embraced with quite the same fervor. I want a good investigative journalist to take the reins on this and let us know the real ramifications and the likely future of copyrighted material.

Questions specifically for public relation pros:
Will micro-payments change how some of you currently use the free alert system?
How will you be affected if Google alerts are forced to change its source list?
Are you prepared to modify your benchmarks to accommodate this change?

  • Share/Bookmark

Is Your Media Measurement Program What Your Executives Ordered?

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

Diet PepsiWhen I go to a restaurant, I usually order a Diet Pepsi. When it isn’t available, a good server will ask, “We have Diet Coke – is  that ok?” A less-interested server will bring me a Diet Coke without saying anything. When this happens, I always let them know I taste the difference. (Granted, to be safe I usually mention it after my meal has arrived at my table.) I don’t do this to be obnoxious, but merely to let them know if a substitution is necessary it should be my choice.

Relax, this isn’t a post about my preference for Pepsi products or a rant demanding that Diet Mountain Dew be more readily available, which is another passion as many of you know.

This is my point: When an executive or client asks for PR “measurement” they usually receive quantitative analysis. Understandably, this often leaves them unsatisfied. While it’s true quantitative results can be quickly produced and placed into charts and graphs, in  most cases these metrics alone don’t truly quench their thirst for PR Measurement. A holistic approach including key quantitative metrics combined with qualitative analysis is the better way to complement your hard work of  effectively getting your story out.

When you are the strategic leader, be it of PR or Communications, remember a measurement tactic is like providing something to drink. Instead, look deeper to figure out what’s causing the thirst in the first place and then provide a solution that satisfies your executive’s thirst for PR effectiveness.

While space limitations and competitive contracts don’t allow most restaurants to provide a comprehensive beverage experience, the PRSA National Capital Chapter is offering a holistic PR Measurement panel on Wednesday, February 25, 2009. I will be there, representing BurrellesLuce as one of the guest panelists for “Using Strategic Media Measurement to Showcase Your Success.” If you are in the Washington DC area and want an informative professional development opportunity, I look forward to meeting you there. We might even share a Diet Pepsi.

  • Share/Bookmark