Posts Tagged ‘media consumption’


The FCC’s National Broadband Plan Could Make Things Interesting For Media

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Five years in the media world is an eternity these days – since 2005 YouTube, Hulu, Twitter, and Facebook have profoundly changed the way we communicate and how we consume media and entertainment. The FCC last week shared the details of their National Broadband Plan that, if approved, should have another major effect on media and entertainment. Their plan is designed to double the households with high speed Internet access from 50 million to 100 million homes by 2015 and it hopes to make broadband 20 times faster by 2020. According to the New York Times, the FCC categorized its congressionally mandated plan, as “a much needed step to keep the nation competitive.” “This plan is necessary to meet the challenges of global competitiveness, and harness the power of broadband to help so many vital national vacationissues,” stated FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski.

The FCC’s justification for its plan is reminiscent of an argument raised back in the 1950’s by our late president Dwight D. Eisenhower. He argued that we needed an interstate highway system for the purpose of national defense. “In the event of an invasion by a foreign power, the military would need good roads to be able to quickly transport troops around the country.” The only troops I can remember being transported quickly was when my parents loaded up the family truckster and drove my sister, brother, and I down U.S. 95 from New Jersey to Florida to see Mickey Mouse. The highway system did, however, open up the country; it motivated more Americans to hit the road on vacation, and allowed for goods to be transported faster and to more destinations.

For the last four years, as the vice president of Media and Entertainment at BurrellesLuce, I’ve closely followed the challenges media companies have been faced with in trying to keep up with the evolution of technology and at the same time protect their content and profits. With the type of speed and reach proposed in the National Broadband plan, media will surely once again evolve into something unfathomable to us at the present time. As highlighted in this article, Google is already getting involved, reportedly working with Intel and Sony Corp to develop a new class of Internet–enabled televisions and set-top boxes.

Whether the availability of a faster Internet in twice the number of households makes us a more competitive country remains to be seen.  But with that kind of speed and access the already growing number of people getting their entertainment and media from the Internet is sure to explode in the coming years. Like the interstate system did for domestic travel, raising the speed limit on the information superhighway (please excuse the 90’s terminology) will allow more people to travel further and faster throughout the media and entertainment world.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark

Watch and Learn: TV’s Response to a Paradigm Shift About to Unfold

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

1464576910_e7c36726dfAnybody who watched late night TV in the late 70’s remembers the words: “this concludes our broadcast day,” followed by a rendition of the Star Spangled Banner, and finally a steady dose of “snow” (which for many of us acted more like an alarm clock in the middle of the night) until the broadcast finally resumed the following morning.

Thirty years later, we’ve come a long way with TV, but something tells me we haven’t seen anything yet…

With consumers’ media consumption habits seemingly in a perpetual state of change, TV is at a crossroads. To avoid risking a fate similar to other traditional media that didn’t react fast enough, TV executives appear intent on adapting quickly to the changing habits of their viewers.

During my recent trip to England, I came across an article in last week’s UK Sunday Times, “Can You Have Too Much Television in America?,” describing U.S. broadcasters as taking nothing for granted when it comes to viewership. The article goes on to say that, with the average U.S. home tuning-in for nearly seven hours a day, broadcasters are already working on the remaining 17 hours with a range of mobile TV services that promise live broadcasts on phones, laptops and in-car screens.

Upon my return to the U.S., I thought I would check the validity of the UK Times article with some hard facts from Nielsen. According to Nielsen, American consumers are watching more than 151 hours per month – an all time high – another three hours on the Internet and four hours using hand held devices.

Beginning with the official end of analog TV on June 12th, with the conversion to digital transmission, the rest of 2009 is sure to bring some of the most revolutionary changes television has ever seen. Time Warner recently announced they’ve slated the second half of 2009 to begin a trial with several distributors for their “TV Everywhere” initiative (the ability to watch TV anywhere, on any device, at anytime). As of April 30, Disney finally agreed to join NBC and Fox as a joint venture partner and equity owner of Hulu, a website that offers commercial-supported streaming video of TV shows and movies.

The stars seem to be aligning for what should be an interesting metamorphosis of a medium that has been around for seventy years. It will be interesting to see where television finds its future niche. Will it be in a wave of mobile video, fueled by an explosion of device subscriptions (a staggering 257 million in the US)? Or will it be the home computer or laptop used by those who prefer to watch their favorite shows on something larger than a three inch screen? Or perhaps it will be the good old-fashioned television set, the only household appliance seemingly getting bigger?

For now the numbers support the notion that when it comes to television, the more things change the more they stay the same. Who knows they might even bring back the Star Spangled Banner. What are your thoughts regarding TV’s paradigm shift? The folks at BurrellesLuce and I would love to know.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark

The Value of Traditional and Online Media

Friday, November 28th, 2008

My friend Yvonne Pover was featured this week in the Washington Post Magazine, a supplement to the Washington Post. She commented on Facebook that she was surprised how many people still read the Washington Post. I was a bit taken aback. “Of course, I read the Post,” was my reply. Although I’m active in social media and sit in front of a computer screen most of the day, I still enjoy picking up the paper and scanning it for news and interesting articles. I also know I’m not alone, and I may be your audience.

That said, there is another audience, one who does receive most of their news online. ComScore did a study on who is consuming traditional versus online media, which can help you identify where your audience is getting their news.

When pitching to a publication, a majority of the time, we are still pitching the print edition reporter or editor, a fact emphasized at two recent media panels I attended. (The Community Media Workshop recently hosted a similar panel and its website offers tips on pitching.) Although newsrooms are changing, most publications do not distinguish between their reporting staffs.

Last week, I met with a client to discuss their media analysis service. They use the print circulation for an article in their reporting, unless it only runs online. I made the case for using both the web audience numbers and the print circulation, because they are different audiences and they often have vastly different readerships. The client appreciated the idea and planned to take it to management.

What’s the point of my rambling? Both print and Internet publications have value. How you value them depends on your client, product or campaign.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark