Posts Tagged ‘Gail Nelson’


PR’s Digital Dilemma: When Can ‘News’ Be Spelled T-w-e-e-t?

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Gail Nelson
For marketing pros, especially those with PR responsibility, the quantity of news is mushrooming. Reading everything you need to know about your clients and products, along with everything you want to know about the industry, takes more time than ever before.* 

In such frenetic circumstances, we’re all asking ourselves how we can best set priorities. One approach many PR practitioners are taking is to communicate in formats such as Twitter. In fact, last week I put out a Twitpoll asking my Twitter followers the source of their PR news. It’s hardly a scientific endeavor. So it’s no surprise that as of this writing, the Twitpoll indicates that communication professionals get most of their PR-related news from Twitter. But content is not on Twitter – it surfaces as links to the sites of content producers. (I recommend reading Monica O’Brien’s recent post on “The Resourceful Marketer” to streamline the process of striking it rich in content on Twitter.)

I’ve been thinking about how many of the concerns facing the macro world of media hold for news purveyors in the PR industry. Can the quality of the content hold up? As you may know, PRWeek is changing its delivery model – switching from a weekly print publication to an email publication and requiring an annual subscription. A new monthly feature magazine will appear in the product line-up, along with a re-launched daily email blast.

In, “It’s Still Called PRWeek, but It’s Going Monthly,” a New York Times article published on April 26, author Stephanie Clifford postulates that it may be too confusing to dub a monthly print publication PRWeek. I contend PRWeek is a bankable brand and produces a range of products – such as webinars and live events. (As head of marketing for BurrellesLuce, I purchase sponsorships for these products, and must say I am impressed by the way the publishing staff is handling the change.)

PRWeek is betting that people will be willing to pay for content on the web that was previously available free of charge. PRWeek’s move is a brave one, especially if it is looking to expand its subscriber base and not merely slash production costs. I am hoping it comes out ahead. People trust its content, and its journalists know how to break and communicate news.

So, what do you think? Where are you getting your content? What are you willing to pay? And will the new PRWeek model take hold?

*  This is why a holistic monitoring service – one that delivers content from both traditional and social media – delivers so much value these days.

  • Share/Bookmark

Social Media – Is There a Payday?

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Gail Nelson
Surprisingly (at least to me) this debate is going strong in some very influential places. Chris Brogan, for one, may harbor some doubts, at least as it pertains to selling Ford Fiestas. His post, “The Real Meat of the Question” was spurred by the post, “Can Social Media Make Us Buy More Cars?,” in which Pete Cashmore discusses Ford’s experiment: the automaker has given 100 active web citizens free use of a Ford Fiesta for six months. The participants agree to post about their experience to Twitter and Facebook and Flickr and YouTube. It’s clearly a blatant grab for buzz (and it’s working – look at all these blog posts!), but will this new campaign generate new sales?  

In the meantime, Chris asks his readers to weigh in on the ability of social media to drive sales. I jumped to comment last night, and put a firm stake in the ground, saying that social media participation (in Twitter and LinkedIn, in particular) by BurrellesLuce folks has resulted in sales. Is it a “paid” program, like Ford’s? No. (We blog and tweet as individuals and participate in the conversions at large.) Has our participation in the PR community resulted in a boatload of sales? Not yet, but it’s growing. Is the cost per sale reasonable? It’s hard to say. We haven’t tracked and valued the time of all who monitor, participate and respond to prospects and customers on social networks. But we do know it’s been an effective final touch point in a number of cases.  And we are pleased to be able to put personal faces on the brand we’ve spent years to build.

So, what do you think? Will a “paid” social media buzz creation campaign sell cars, or would only a more organic effort move the needle? And If you decided to ramp up your participation in social media  - whether or not you “seed” the conversation the way Ford is – would you have the systems in place – both monitoring and measurement – to be able to answer the question, “Does social media have a payday?”

twitter-background.jpg

  • Share/Bookmark

Trials and Tribulations in Twitterville

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

Gail Nelson
Trials and Tribulations in TwittervilleRemember reading blogs using an RSS reader? I do. That was my everyday practice before I shifted more of my social media consumption to Twitter. This past weekend, I cozied up to my Google Reader for a good long time, and explored a surprisingly deep Twitter backlash. Who knew?

Silly
Check out this short animation from SuperNews called “Twouble with Twitters.” (I found it on the Murphy’s Law blog).  The plot: a twenty-something guy tries to persuade his twenty-something co-worker to join Twitter. It doesn’t end well. While the first twenty-something implores the second to “twitterstand,” the unconvinced co-colleague asserts that Twitter is about “randomly bragging about your unexceptional life.” (Funny, and partially true.)

Cluttered
Brian Solis has announced Friendfilter, a Twitter plug-in. You may use it to preview the profile and usage statistics of potential followers and determine if they are worth your time. It’s a form of white-listing – although receiving excessive tweets is self-inflicted form of spam, the downside of cultivating a large following. The way I see it, Friendfilter could also help power Twitter users (@gail_nelson is not one) to avoid hanging out with the less popular kids.

Superficial
In a theme he’s been building over a few posts, Robert Scoble (the Scobelizer) compares the nature of Twitter (public) with Facebook (private), and tries to figure out how each of these free services will structure advertising fees. The personal details users are willing to share on Facebook signal purchase decisions that make advertisers salivate, Scoble asserts.  People don’t tweet with the same depth, making the Twitter audience less valuable.

Addictive
Well, I’d better get this blog post off and uploaded so I can get back onto Twitter and tweet about it.

  • Share/Bookmark

Red State vs. Blue State: The Great Twitter Divide

Friday, February 20th, 2009

Gail Nelson
lovehate.jpgAs Kevin Dugan says in his recent post, microblogging site Twitter inspires a lot of passion. Twitter addicts are pitted against Twitter haters. And some people just don’t know what to make of Twitter.

Also this week, the social media haves and have-nots battled it out in the PR and marketing blogs. Jeremiah Owyang of Forrester weighed in on a discussion originating at Cece’s blog  as to whether a PR firm requires a high-profile, branded social media presence to legitimately advise its client. As of this morning, these two posts have attracted 90 comments.

From those who attend and ask questions at our webinars and download BurellesLuce newsletters and white papers, we know that many PR pros are still in the early stages of social media engagement.  My reaction to these heated discussions is that one-size-fit-all thinking – nobody should Twitter, everyone must have a big social media footprint – is very similar to Red State/Blue State thinking. Polarization doesn’t serve our country well all the time, and it’s probably not the best course for PR professionals. Experimentation with new channels is a good thing, but I think PR pros shine when they root their plans – whether for their clients and their own firms — in audience research and good communication strategy. What is your experience?

  • Share/Bookmark

You First

Monday, January 19th, 2009

Gail Nelson
An experience the BurrellesLuce Marketing team shares with many other marketing and public relations professionals is the task of figuring out how to serve our clients and our business goals through social media. As we continue to get our feet wet through hands-on experience – this blog is one tactic, as is Facebook and microblogging – we also listen and engage our audience through research. The goal: create a social media roadmap for the future.

What’s clear right now is the Marketing department simply cannot do it alone. (Is anyone else hearing the song, “I Can’t Do It Alone,” from the movie musical Chicago, in their heads right now?) Colleagues from the Sales, Client Service, Media Measurement, Content Management, and Technology areas are among the contributing authors to Fresh Ideas. Additional BurrellesLuce staff members, including myself, are active on Twitter.

Lately, some tweets hit close to home. Here’s one story I’d like to share: This month’s invoice stuffer (produced by the Marketing department) was devoted to our “green and easy” initiative – where we ask our clients to forgo paper invoices in favor of emailed statements. Promoting a green initiative via a print piece didn’t quite mesh with one client. The client, we’ll call her Mary, tweeted that she had opened her bill to find a color invoice stuffer on fairly heavy stock suggesting she go green. “You first, BurrellesLuce, you first,” she said.

untitled-1.jpg

Because we constantly monitor and listen to various social media outlets, we found Mary’s tweet quickly. I used data from our CRM system to phone her (Twitterers: I couldn’t send her a direct message because she wasn’t one of my followers) and introduced myself as senior vice president of Marketing. I thanked her for sharing her concerns, and relayed how our mailing equipment malfunctions if we use lighter-weight paper. As more clients accept email bills, our plan is to cease mailing altogether and gain the environmental benefits listed on the invoice stuffer. I also encouraged Mary to contact me in the future should the need arise.

Within a few minutes of our conversation, she tweeted her thanks for the phone call. I follow Mary on Twitter now, and she follows me. Engaging in these types of conversations can be a little frightening at first, especially to non-millennials like me raised on the command-and-control battlefield of corporate communications. But with each interaction, we learn more about our clients and prospects and the value of social media. “You first” challenges are both easier for me to accept, and more rewarding.

  • Share/Bookmark