Posts Tagged ‘credibility’


Jeffrey Gitomer Sales Caffeine: Ten Smart Things That Lead To A Sale

Friday, June 11th, 2010

by Carol Holden*

Smart SalesJeffrey Gitomer’s Sales Caffeine column is a weekly coffee break stop for me.  This week’s column struck me, in particular, because it was written from the perspective of a purchaser. 

Someone in purchasing, who reads his column, had contacted Jeffrey and he, in turn, had asked her for a list of the smart things that lead to a sale. She also gave him the dumb list, but I am just going to reinforce the positives below. We’ve probably heard them before, but this is a clear concise list that can never be repeated too often:

10 Smart “Things” that Lead to a Sale

  1. Honesty. Truth at all times and at all costs. Do not lie and think you’ll get away with it, because you won’t. If I can’t tell you’re a liar immediately. I’ll find out in a short period of time. One lie banishes you.
  2. Give me valuable ideas. If you can provide suggestions or ideas on how to make business better, you’ll be a hero to me and a valuable resource.
  3. Understand and be interested in my business. If you make an attempt to show interest and understand, I’ll spend all the time in the world to educate you, because you’ll only be better equipped to help me. Plus, it will make your job easier as well. A win for me – and a bigger win for you.
  4.  Treat me with respect. Be courteous, on time and well mannered. If you’re not, it’s a guaranteed deal-killer.
  5.  Be a decent human being, with some sense of ethics and morals. It makes me feel positive about doing business with you and gives me some reassurance you won’t try to screw me over.
  6.  Know your own business cold. Know it well enough so that you can make an understandable and knowledgeable presentation and answer my questions about your product or service. Provide good supporting materials – especially testimonials.
  7. Be friendly and personable. It helps to establish a sense of comfort and trust.
  8.  Remember the details. They’re small, but they can completely make my day or ruin it.
  9.  Make good on your word. If you can’t, come to me and we’ll talk it out. If you don’t, then your credibility is damaged or even ruined (depending on how often it happens and when).
  10.  Take responsibility. You are my link to your company. Handle what I need seamlessly, and own up to a mistake if you make one.

And the single smartest thing that leads to a sale:

  • Don’t “sell” me. Let me “buy.” Make me see for myself that “buying” is the right thing to do.

What I like best about these tips is that all or mostly everything listed applies to any sales situation whether you are “selling” a story idea to a journalist, a service like BurrellesLuce, or almost any other “product.”  And it’s also the backbone of a client service relationship as well. Here’s the customer laying out in front of us how to do business with them.  Remember the adage, the customer’s always right?

And if you’re looking to tie this to your PR agency Jim Joseph, president Lippe Taylor Brand Communications, provides some tips on closing a sale in this video

 

How will you apply these the next time you are working with a client or prospect or the media? If you already incorporate similar practices into current “selling” strategy, how have they benefited you?

***

Bio: I’ve been in the media business all of my adult life, first in newspapers before going full circle and joining BurrellesLuce, where I now direct the Media Measurement department. I’ve always enjoyed meeting and especially listening to the needs of our customers and others in the public relations and communications fields; I welcome sharing ideas through the Fresh Ideas blog. One of my professional passions is providing the type of service to a client that makes them respond, “atta girl” – inspiring our entire team to keep striving to be the best. Although I have been lucky enough to travel through much of Asia and most major U.S. cities for business or pleasure, my free time is now spent with my daughter, visiting family/friends, and of course the Jersey shore. Twitter: @domeasurement LinkedIn: Carol Holden Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Who Can You Trust? Mainstream Versus Social Media News Sources

Friday, April 9th, 2010

by Crystal deGoede*

trust_me_im_a_newspaper_journalist_dog_shirt-p1555540609999702762v7vb_210

Razzle.com

We all rely on mainstream media to tell us what is going on in the world. We trust the credibility of traditional news as an authority and we expect that at least 95 percent of what they report is the truth. It’s also no secret that the bulk of social media relies on traditional media as the source of its content as well. (Citizen journalism, in the form of breaking world events, is the exception not the rule, but even that often overlaps with traditional media.) I have to admit that I use social media during the day to get a quick glimpse of headlines from the traditional media outlets that I follow – and I am sure that I am not alone.

So, why are more traditional media outlets getting their “news” from social media lately? Social Media is fast and cuts to the chase (only 140 characters), but most of the time we have to wonder if what we are reading is even true (assuming we’re reading what we’re about to tweet or repost in the first place). And with the media landscape changing, it is understandable that mainstream media would want to remain the go-to source. But at what price?

Last Thursday was everyone’s favorite holiday, the one day that you can call your parents and tell them you got married in Vegas, “Aprils Fool’s Day.” We saw many large, well-known organizations joining in with their own pranks, such as Google, changing its name to Topeka, and McDonald’s, going along with a post by Grist, an environmental news website…

Grist announced that McDonald’s would no longer continue its worldwide composting initiatives after a University of California-Berkeley scientist discovered that none of the items on the menu would compost – complete with a photo seemingly depicting a year old “Happy Meal” still relatively fresh. What makes this story interesting is that the news began to spread across social media as if it was legitimate. All of this began with a blog post on March 3rd by Joann Bruso, wishing her “Happy Meal” a “Happy Birthday” and that lead to Grist’s April Fool’s prank. The question is how or why did a New York Times writer tweet the story?  (Check out a recent Fast Company article to see how the story plays out.)

In an effort to keep up with the ever-changing media landscape, do you think traditional media outlets are cutting corners and not checking their facts? Or are they just trying to stay hip – proving they’re in on the joke? It is funny how six months ago studies showed that people tweeting and updating in social media were using content from mainstream media sources and I still find that true. But are we all becoming so gullible and wrapped up in the “I want it now” lifestyle that we are making short-cuts in order to be the first to report?

I am sure you all remember the breaking news last July that actor Jeff Goldblum was dead. Many popular news organizations actually printed, and ran with the story for a couple of hours even though they found it online and the reports weren’t confirmed. I place a lot of trust in traditional media, as I am sure most of you do, and I always will; accidents happen and people post without understanding the repercussions and without scrutinizing the facts. No matter if we are a major news journalist or a back office tweeter, can we ever know that something on the Internet or printed in the paper is completely true? Not unless we are willing to get the hard-facts, do the research, and spend hours verifying every source.

As major news organizations, journalist, and mainstream bloggers they are trusted by their publics and their credibility depends on “getting the facts right” and producing quality stories. And as news consumer don’t we have an obligation to educate ourselves and help ensure accuracy before passing the information along? Shouldn’t the media and its audiences work together to create a certain standard of news and then hold each other accountable when it isn’t met? Then again, perhaps, “quick and easy” and “check the facts later” are the acceptable standards.

So, do you think mainstream media is trying to keep up with the fast-paced world of Twitter, Facebook, and other forms of social media by using content they find on the web?  Do you rely on traditional news outlets for the truth? Share your thoughts with the readers with BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas.

*Bio: After graduating from East Carolina University with a Marketing degree in 2005, Crystal DeGoede moved to New Jersey. In her four years as a member of the BurrellesLuce marketing team and through her interaction with peers and clients she has learned what is important or what it takes to develop a career when you are just starting out. She is passionate about continuing to learn about the industry in which we serve and about her career path. By engaging readers on Fresh Ideas Crystal hopes to further develop her social media skills and inspire other “millennials” who are just out of college and/or working in the field of marketing and public relations. Twitter: @cldegoede LinkedIn: Crystal DeGoede Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Are You Still Using Multipliers?

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

flickr_graphmeeting_2136954043_5145b15312.jpgDuring a recent PRSA webinar sponsored by BurrellesLuce I referenced the Institute for Public Relations (IPR) white paper, “Dispelling the Myth of PR Multipliers and Other Inflationary Audience Measures” by: Mark Weiner and Don Bartholomew. This prompted many follow-up questions, mostly about the “greater” credibility of editorial content vs. advertising. As noted in the white paper there are flaws in that thinking and there is no substantiated data proving this notion.

The white paper is excellent and should be read by everyone currently using multipliers in their measurement rationale and those thinking about its implications.

Here I want to provide my very “Reader’s Digest” summary for our peers who may need to recalibrate existing benchmarks if they lose a multiplier. In the real world of business, a “multiplier” of publisher supported data is an “Enron Metric.” The more you have to explain something, the more you compromise the credibility. Think about it this way: Your company has a certain number of clients. That’s the number. Would it be acceptable for the customer service department to report a higher number because they have a lot of “happy clients” or “clients who are referring business”? No. Then why would you want to put forward a number that can’t stand on its own merit?

The power of social media is thriving and growing by word-of-mouth and the influence of peers. The reason: credibility. Don’t compromise your greatest asset by taking a short cut or using numbers that aren’t straight forward and/or supported by a third-party data source.

  • Share/Bookmark