Friday, February 25th, 2011
The Academy Awards Show is my Super Bowl. That’s what I’ll tell my husband on Sunday, when I NEED to start watching the TV at 3 p.m. and switch between channels for all the best Red Carpet viewing possible. Additionally, I’ll have one or two laptops going with multiple Twitter searches refreshing faster than I can read. YouTube will help me replay some of the best and worst dresses on the Red Carpet.
I used to host an Oscar viewing party. But, I don’t need to anymore. I have all my social media
friends to confirm that so-and-so did have the ugliest dress and celebrity Y should have shaved.
The Wall Street Journal confirmed I’m not alone and reported on the efforts of several agencies who have celebrities posting live updates via Twitter and Facebook streams during the Oscars. The article reports social media advertising company MyLikes Inc. has Khloe and Kourtney Kardashian commenting on fashion via Twitter for fashion site Gilt Groupe. It was noted, however, that marketers are still working to find the fine-line between selling and adding to the conversation.
This year, Oscar.com will offer live streaming from backstage in an effort to attract younger users to their site. Additionally, there will be interactive ways to enter your predictions and help choose a designer dress for the on-stage awards escort. If you have an iPad, you can download the Oscar app for the same interaction. Adding to the interactivity, Sprint is partnering with People.com for a real-time trivia game during the show.
Advertising Age says the cost for a 30 second spot for the Academy Awards show has increased this year to $1.7 million, and the Los Angeles Times reports the spots are sold-out. It’s not the $3 million the Super Bowl demands, but it’s getting there for arguably the second most watched event of the year. Oscar commercials are usually targeted to women, unlike the Super Bowl ads, which were mostly directed at men. This is an opportunity for advertisers to target the real decision makers in most households.
I wonder how many brands are looking for tie-ins to Oscars to capture the interest of the media and celebrity obsessed viewers? Pop Secret hosted a Twitter party, #PopCameraAcation, on February 24 and they used mommy bloggers to spread the word. What other hashtags will I be encouraged to use on Oscar night?
In my earlier BurrellesLuce Fesh Ideas post on 2010 Trends and 2011 Predictions…, the 2010 Academy Awards did not make the top 10 for Twitter trends. Could this have been because there are several hashtags being used to talk about the event? Also in the post was a prediction for the true integration of social media with PR. Will PR efforts around the Oscars take us a step closer to this?
How are other marketers promoting their brand with a tie-in to the Oscars? What will communications professionals learn from this year’s Academy awards? Were they successful? I’d like to hear your thoughts.
Tags: #PopCameraAcation, 2010 Trends and 2011 Predictions, advertising, Advertising Age, apps, BurrellesLuce, communications, Debbie Friez, decision makers, digital, Facebook, Fresh Ideas, Gift Groupe, Gilt Group, Khloe Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, marketing, MyLikes, Oscar, Oscar.com, People.com, PR, Public Relations, Red Carpet, Social Media, Super Bowl, The Academy Awards, Twitter, Wall Street Journal, YouTube
Posted in Advertising/Marketing, Broadcast, Media Industry, Public Relations, Social Media | No Comments »
Monday, August 9th, 2010
by Crystal deGoede*
Retargeting – when online targeted advertising is delivered to consumers based on previous Internet actions that did not result in a past conversion – has become more importunate (persistent) as we continue to increasingly use the Internet to shop, order food, book travel, monitor the news or for pretty much anything you want to do without leaving the house.
It is also becoming more widely used within the advertising arena. With so many similar
brands in the market it is hard to differentiation yourself from the other guy, and this form of remarketing can help to successfully convert those lost opportunities.
This past week Michael Learmonth, digital lead at Advertising Age expressed his creepy experience with Zappos, and “The Pants That Stalked [Him] on the Web.”
Oddly enough, after reading Learmonth’s post I was having dinner with my friend Nancy who was “weirded out” by a similiar experience. Ever since she booked a room at Loews Hotel ads for the hotel began appearing on every website that she visited. She is a sales trader so PPC (pay-per-click), Twitter, retargeting, and cookies are not really in her vocabulary. So I thought it would be interesting to research if retargeting is as effective as marketing and advertising professionals believe and how it actually works.
According to Criteo, a company that specializes in scalable personalized retargeting, more than 90 percent of website visitors leave before converting (i.e., making a purchase, downloading a white paper, etc.) Other research has shown that it can take at least seven follow-up emails or phone calls with prospects to actual convert them to a sale. If we are only tracking those visitors that convert on our physical websites, we are simply losing out on a possible sale down the road. Websites these days are optimized for search and have the technology to place cookies on each visitor’s computers to measure the site’s true audience size, but that is only capturing IP addresses most of the time. Then they have us, until we remove all our cookies and empty our cache.
So how do these retargeting customized ads work? When a prospect/client browses your website they become tagged with a snippet of code, which tracks which products they have shown interest in. When they leave the website and begin visiting other pages that’s when the retargeting begins. Banner ads customized to their search on your site start appearing on sites all over the web, from news, social networks, blogs, etc.
Companies that are using retargeting firms, such as Fetchback, in their marketing strategy have seen a 592 percent increase in ROI and conversions up by 94 percent. There are many other benefits to this form of behavioral marketing. It helps streamline all of your campaigns and the frequency of the ads helps keep your brand on the top of prospects minds. (Most services have an integrated feature that allows you to place a limit on the frequency at which the ads appear, so you don’t bomb your potential clients and “creep” them out because everywhere they go they see you.)
Plus, your ads are not static on a particular site related to your industry, which usually does not yield a lot of traffic because that market is already saturated and are either already your clients or know who you are. With retargeting your ads you are only reengaging with new prospects that have already shown interest in your brand; you can focus on what their needs are and manage your ROI.
In short, retargeting helps build your brand and online presence, while increasing the chances of reengaging your audience. It is not going to convert all on its own and has to be used with traditional marketing tactics to be effective. So don’t eliminate your current strategies. It is also important to measure the effectiveness of your retargeting campaigns, ensuring it is worth the investment and that your conversion rates are higher.
This article from Inc. Magazine highlights a retargeting success story involving Scottevest and its partnership with firm AdRoll.
There is one downside to the growing popularity for converting leads more efficiently via retargeting and that is the possibility that people may have the choice to opt-out (a do not call list for the Internet) of all behavioral targeting ads. What does that do for brands that are following the rules and not hunting down prospects on the web? We lose the opportunity to generate qualified leads for our sales team and revenue for the company. If you do use retargeting make sure you limit your reach frequency because when people begin to feel harassed and stalked by brands they will opt-out; I would.
Is your organization taking on the strategy of retargeting advertising? If so, how successful have you been with campaigns and reengaging lost prospects? Do you think we should have the right to opt-out of all behavioral targeting ad campaigns or just the irritating ones? Please share your thoughts and ideas with me and the BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas readers.
Tags: action, AdRoll, ads, advertising, Advertising Age, audience, banner ads, behavioral, Blogs, brands, BurrellesLuce, cache, campaigns, client, compensate, consumers, conversion, converting, cookies, creepy, Criteo, Crystal DeGoede, customized, digital, download, effective, emails, Fetchback, Fresh Ideas, Inc. Magazine, industry, information, integrated, Internet, investment, IP addresses, lead, log-in, Lowes Hotel, marketing, measure, Michael Learmonth, monitor, news, online, opportunities, opt-out, pay-per-click, personalized, phone calls, presence, professionals, prospects, purchase, qualified, rates, re-marketing, re-targeting, reengaging, research, result, retargeting, ROI, rules, sale, sales trader, scalable, Scottvest, search, services, size, Social Networks, static, strategy, streamline, success, success story, tagged, Technology, The Pants that Stalked Me on the Web, tracking, traditional, traffic, Twitter, visitors, website, white paper, Zappos
Posted in Advertising/Marketing, Public Relations, Technology | 3 Comments »