Posts Tagged ‘Adage’


The Death of the Angry Customer Letter?

Monday, July 12th, 2010
498649407_95ea537f91

Flickr Image: xJasonRogersx's

Not long ago, there was little recourse for poor customer service.  Sure, you could bite your tongue while waiting in line or demand to see a manager. Really though, the only way to get your point across would be the old-standby, the “dissatisfied customer letter” sent to management. If you were lucky, you might receive a reply back with their apologies and a coupon for $20 off your next purchase of four new tires.

The emergence of social media now presents an engaging and provocative problem for customer service. A client’s recourse is now immediate and omnipresent. Companies better be on their toes at all times or they run the risk of angering the wrong person with the right medium.

In his Adage story “Are Major Marketers Training John Q. Public to Whine on Web?,” Michael Bush states that customers are becoming used to quick responses to their posted complaints. He goes further than that saying, “… magically resolving complaints broadcast to the world by social media raises a question: By rewarding complainers with lightning-fast responsiveness, are marketers training consumers to publicly flog them rather than take the discreet and often-frustrating route of calling customer service?”

So as a company, not only do you now have to respond quickly to an upset customer or risk their issue going viral, you also have to worry that in doing so, you’re just setting yourself up for similar actions down the road.

Your clients can now use their phones to tweet their dissatisfaction with your service while they’re in a line experiencing it. This is all happening in real time. While the days of mailing out an angry letter may be nearing an end, we’ve just begun to feel the impact of the angry posts: You neglect to monitor your company’s online profile at your own peril.

How has social media and online communications affected the way you interact with clients? Do you think it’s true that customers who complain openly in public forums receive faster and better service than those who choose to complain privately via letter, email, or telephone? Share your thoughts with the readers of BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas.

  • Share/Bookmark

How to Leverage YouTube in Your PR Campaign

Monday, May 24th, 2010

At the PRSA International Conference, last fall, I attended the “PR Needs YouTube” panel discussion and subsequently wrote a recap of the session. We were told that in September 2009, Americans conducted 3.5 billion searches on YouTube.  In April 2010, just seven months later, that number is even higher at 3.7 billion searches, according to comScore.

An AdAge article stated that some marketers have just about given up on the traditional path to broadcast media coverage – instead of pitching their stories to reporters, they are directly engaging consumers through original content they and their agencies have created. “And while they haven’t completely abandoned traditional media outlets, big-name marketers such as Procter & Gamble, Best Buy, MasterCard and Coldwell Banker are among those who have taken matters into their own hands by creating content and bringing it straight to consumers.” 

 And, it’s not just broadcast news using video anymore. A large number of traditional print outlets have online affiliate sites that are complementing text with video – even radio stations are getting into the game by incorporating videos into their websites.

If you aren’t already utilizing YouTube in your public relations efforts, it’s definitely time to sit up and take notice! (My colleague Denise Giacin recently discussed a similar topic in her blog post, “YouTube Turns Five … Are You Tuned In?”)

So, how do you get started?  Here are some tips from Douglas Idugboe at smedio:

  • First (obviously) create the video. Expensive equipment or production studio time is not needed; you can use your own flipcam or other video recorder.
  • Build your own YouTube channel by choosing a name. The name should include your company’s or one that reflects the product/service category you’re associated with. Register it and you’ll receive a URL reading youtube.com/user/[yourfullnamehere]. 
  • Create a profile and upload an avatar or video screenshot that catches peoples’ attention.
  • YouTube has different types of accounts. Idugboe recommends “Guru” to stand above the crowd.
  • You can upload your own images and backgrounds to create a look consistent with your website, blog, business cards, etc.
  • To help build your brand and your online community, check all relevant options under “Modules”
  • If you want viewers to always see the latest and greatest, click “Edit” on the screen’s top right. At “Featured Video” click “Use the Most Recent”

From there you’ll then want to:

  1. Embed your YouTube videos on your website and blog.
  2. Link your channel and videos everywhere possible to maximize visibility (making sure to follow the rules of proper engagement).
  3. Leverage your current network, and let YouTube help grow and expand it.
  4. If applicable, notify local newspapers, TV and any other media outlets via press releases, to alert their audiences to your video.

In addition to cross-marketing to your existing network and the media, you’re probably asking “How do I optimize the video for SEO?”  In the video below, Greg Jarboe provides three tips for video search engine optimization from the International Search Summit in London last week:

Do you have additional tips on using video for PR for the BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas readers? Are you using YouTube or other video sharing sites?  Care to share any examples of successful (or unsuccessful) cases of video used in public relations campaigns?

  • Share/Bookmark

Fair game or “Brandjacking”?

Friday, September 25th, 2009

1548293558_f14cc7020f_mIf you are a big brand name, you’ll want to hurry over to http://www.squidoo.com/ and see if you now have your own “dashboard” or “Unofficial Water Cooler” page on their server. If so, I definitely want to hear your thoughts.

Yesterday Advertising Age reported on Seth Godin’s new “Brands in Public” online aggregation system. It essentially takes Google content and some social media feeds (worth noting that all tweets and feeds do not disclose the screen name of the poster) and puts them into a dashboard. Seems harmless enough, right? Well, if you are one of the “hundreds” of brands now with an unofficial page – and Trader Joe’s is one – you may have a different opinion.

The Trader Joe dashboard was highlighted in the article so I naturally “had to see it.” The best I can tell, the real menace on the Trader Joe’s site is MeganCasey. As editor-in chief of Squidoo, she has commented in two separate areas of the Trader Joe page. Perhaps it’s because she’s an avid shopper and her feedback is sincere; I’m sure she does think: “This is a really cool dashboard of Trader Joe’s info and comments. Nice to see it all at a glance. Thanks for putting it together!” But isn’t that a bit self-serving since it is her company that created this unsolicited “dashboard” using the Trader Joe’s brand? The reality is each time this page is updated with a comment, including those by MeganCasey, the Google rank for this page increases.

I’d like to hear what Andy Sernovitz, founder of Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA) thinks about the ethics of these dashboards. It would be interesting to hear from someone at TEKgroup, who could provide counsel to both Squidoo and the hundreds of affected brands about why RSS feeds aren’t always the best way to “showcase” of your coverage. And I’d like some of the great BurrellesLuce clients and PR minds to share how they would advise a client about a “ready made” dashboard. 

It’s also worth noting that if these dashboards are a great service to brands, why isn’t there one for “Squidoo” or “BzzAgent” (the two companies responsible for the concept and content)?

Has Squidoo upset the balance of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) as we know it? Or simply found a way to extort $4800.00 a year from public relations practitioners trying to be good stewards of their brand?

UPDATE: This morning Seth Godin sent out an “Adjusting as we go” post about the reaction to his “Brands in Public” idea. He stands behind the concept and positions it as a way to help brands and non-profits “be part of the conversation.” I’ve long been a fan of Seth Godin and respect him, so maybe this is just guerrilla marketing. After all, if he gets one hundred of the brands to send him a check that’s $480,000.00 to stream unfiltered RSS feeds. GENIUS!

  • Share/Bookmark

Convergence of Advertising and PR: Ads Targeting Both Online and Broadcast Mediums

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

by Jeffrey Barrett*
A recent announcement has Google on the path to implement targeted online advertising. This is advertising driven by your individual actions and user history with Google products. They have worked hard to stick to their “do no evil“motto by including opt out functionality in an attempt to appease those concerned with privacy. When I posted about this area of convergence in the online ad space, a commenter mentioned that it would not be cost effective to engage in CPM based direct messaging. This shift by Google may reinforce the CPC model that they use.

Convergence of Advertising and Public Relations

On the broadcast front, one-to-one advertising is beginning to get more consideration, especially in these tough economic times. Canoe Ventures is in part at the center of this and is working to create on-demand, heavily targeted ads for broadcast viewers. While the technology seems to be in place it faces legal and social pushback. Either some of the restrictions need to change, or companies like Canoe Ventures may be “encouraged” to take a hint from Google and present a “do no evil” exterior.

So, we have two companies and two industries working on the same goal; getting an exact message to one person based on what is “known” about that person. From what I understand PR also strives to deliver a targeted message to a person based on what is “known” about that person. Is this another step towards merging PR with advertising based on up-and-coming technologies? This would seem to be backed up by wording that implies a blending of PR and advertising in an article a friend of mine recently sent me an article from Adage regarding Walmart’s rethinking their PR strategy. Is Walmart edging towards a new model for PR? And if so, could direct influencing be a part of it?

My colleagues and I at BurrellesLuce, would love to hear your thoughts.

*Bio: Currently I am the chief architect of BurrellesLuce 2.0, the portal used by thousands of PR professionals to monitor, share, organize, and measure online and print news. I started as a web developer for Merck & Company and I am an accomplished technologist with a focus on large scale system architecture and implementation. With over ten years of experience designing and deploying technical solutions for a wide range of companies, I most recently managed web projects for NBC Universal, where I delivered social networking applications and supported high traffic applications. Prior to that, I served as director of technology for Silver Carrot, a marketing firm, creating and delivering the technology that powered high-performance online campaigns. In my spare time, I enjoy reading about economics and anything that has to do with modeling social interaction and social media. LinkedIn: Jeffrey Barrett; Twitter: @BurrellesLuce; Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark