Archive for ‘Twitter’:


If You Follow Me I will Follow You…

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

by Colleen Flood*

While looking at my Tweetdeck on HootSuite yesterday, I started singing the song “Follow” in my head by Genesis. This is a great song from the 80s that brings back a memory of my sister and brother-in-law dancing to their wedding song. Though, this time it wasn’t the memory of my sister’s first dance. I think the reason it came to me was the buzz lately regarding following and un-following on Twitter these days. 

Flickr Image:
Flickr Image: alasam

In addition, as my followers can attest, I was recently the victim of a spam attack which sent out “inappropriate” messages to all of my followers. Thankfully those who received the message quickly informed me of the issue. For many, this was the first time we had directly communicated with one another, however – not exactly the best first impression. But unfortunately, I am not the first person and probably won’t be the last to have their account hacked while using Twitter.

Both the headlines and my recent situation have inspired me to look more closely at the people who follow me and I in return follow back.

One example is a follow I received from @alatulip26268. While I’m flattered to have gained another follower, why are they following me? Is it because they are tied to public relations and possibly curious about the services BurrellesLuce can provide? Or, perhaps we share the same interests – such as a passion for skiing? Upon closer examination, it seems as though this profile amounts to little more than spam or at least that’s how it appears.  So I did not follow @alatulip26268 back.

Another example is a recent follow I received from @worob. This follow I felt “privileged” to receive because @worob is in a similar industry as me and has quite an impressive bio: “Former reporter turned PR rock star, Publisher for PR at Sunrise, Creator of Big East PR Pros Networking Group on LinkedIn, SM enthusiast & aspiring guitarist!” I decided it could be very beneficial to follow this person back after reading some of his past tweets. Although I have not engaged with @worob yet, I hope to and anticipate @worob is following me for all the same reasons I’m following him.

There has also been some talk that many are using Twitter as merely a numbers game or a popularity contest to see how many followers one can accumulate. To gain more followers, many are only following someone to get a follow back. 

Mikinzie Stuart (@mikinzie) recently wrote about this subject in a post on the Brazen Careerist blog entitled, “In Review:  FriendorFollow.com.” FriendorFollow.com is a website that tells you who out of those you follow do not follow you back. Mikinzie, who I follow, wrote that when she first went on this site she was upset that many of those she follows, has engaged with, and even met in real life have un-followed her. 

She goes on to say that at first it bothered her but now it does not one bit. She’s not on Twitter for the numbers or the popularity. I agree and will not be discouraged by my un-followers, which I did check out and was surprised by, and will as Mikinzie put it “continue to share in the mutually beneficial relationships derived from my Twitter community.”

Do you follow back every person who follows you? What are your guidelines for those you follow?

*Bio: Colleen Flood has been a sales consultant with BurrellesLuce for over 12 years and is eager to become a more integrated part of the social-public relations community. She primarily handles agency relations in the New York and New Jersey metro-area. She is not only passionate about work, but also about family, friends, and the Jersey Shore. Twitter: @cgflood LinkedIn: Colleen Flood Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

The Unwritten Rules of Social Media

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

by Lauren Shapiro*

Leave a seat between you and a stranger at the movie theater. Don’t hold eye contact for more than four or five seconds with any stranger… These are just two unwritten rules we know and assume others would know too. We typically do not put too much thought into these “rules,” but when one is broken it’s shocking. But who makes these rules?  In face-to-face communication, a lot of it has to do with personal distance and maintaining your space, while being respectful of the space of others.  

In computer mediated communication (CMC), specifically looking at social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, netiquette is very much Business_Dealthe “This is how we do things around here” context in which the culture of these communities operate. This is potentially why individuals are hesitant to join or participate once they do. The tech savvy twenty-something generation, who was in college during the evolution of Facebook, mastered the art of netiquette early on and practically wrote the book on what we do and don’t do on these sites.

In a world where physical distance is the least of your concerns, how do you ensure that your online behavior agrees with what is expected in online communities? Most non-verbal CMC is common sense and varies based on which “you” (e.g., the personal you or the business you) is represented in the online forum. Blurring the line between your personal and business life is becoming more commonplace. But it can also be very risky, so be aware. Understand that “friending” your boss on Facebook will give them access to your pictures, your friends, your status and your wall (unless, of course, you set your privacy settings). Even so, remaining mindful of your social networking circle is key. If you are Facebook friends with colleagues and bosses, posting “Work sucks!” is clearly a bad idea.

Some behaviors are not as clear cut. According to Jeremiah Owyang, who pens the Web Strategist blog, “You should only follow people who you trust, you think are interesting, or that you learn from.” He goes on to say, that in doing so, “It’s possible you’ll offend some people…” (Although, some may think it’s more offensive not to “friend” a person on Facebook).

Yet, it is ok to “take a risk and follow someone outside your immediate [Twitter] circle,” says Stowe Boyd, a social media consultant who writes the /message blog. (This is often frowned upon on Facebook).

Also, unselfish Tweeters tend to be viewed more positively than Tweeters who do not contribute to others’ posts. These and other interesting tips can be found  in the Computer World article, “Twitter Etiquette: Five Dos and Don’ts.

Exploring social networking sites and understanding their culture will lead to a better comprehension of how to “fit in” on each site. What unwritten rules have you learned on social networking sites? What rules would you like to see adopted in the future? Which ones do you think can be done away with? Please share your thoughts with me and the readers of BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas. 

*Bio: Soon after graduating from the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, in 2006 with a B.A. in communication and a B.S. in business/marketing, I joined the BurrellesLuce client services team. In 2008, I completed my master’s degree in corporate and organizational communications and now work as the supervisor of BurrellesLuce Express client services. I am passionate about researching and understanding the role of email in shaping relationships from a client relation/service standpoint as well as how miscommunication occurs within email, which was the topic of my thesis. Through my posts on Fresh Ideas, I hope to educate and stimulate thoughtful discussions about corporate communications and client relations, further my own knowledge on this subject area, as well as continue to hone my skills as a communicator. Twitter: @_LaurenShapiro_ LinkedIn: laurenrshapiro Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Shared Experience Becomes Experience We Share

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Bill Hiniker is principal at MessagePoint Communications, a writing and consulting practice specializing in corporate and executive communications.  He blogs at http://www.messagepointblog.blogspot.com/ and can be reached at messagepoint@cox.net.

Instead of being a “shared experience,” TV is quickly becoming “an experience we share.”  That observation, made on a recent episode of NPR’s always-enjoyable Culturetopia podcast, really rings true for me.

I’m a first-generation television kid and am old enough to remember when the television dial was really a dial with 13 numbers. There were just three networks plus an educational channel and an independent channel or two that mostly showed old movies. Miss “The Twilight Zone,” “Ed Sullivan,” “Laugh-In” or, later, “Saturday Night Live” and you risked being left out of the lunchtime conversation. 

That was pretty much the way of the world until the first video recorders began appearing in homes and offices in the 1980s. Almost overnight it became possible to borrow a missed episode of “Cheers” from a coworker who hadn’t forgotten to set his VCR (as long as he didn’t have a Beta machine).  

This opened up a whole new world for communications professionals. Suddenly it became possible to record, copy, and share cassettes of the annual meeting or positive media coverage with employees, customers, and other stakeholders. 

Fast forward a decade or two and digital technology made it possible to post videos on company websites and e-mail links – or even short clips – to your key publics. Even more importantly, you could forward clips of cats playing the piano or bears catching fish to your friends.

 

Technology has continued to advance at warp speed. You can now see most of your favorite shows online or buy them for a couple of bucks on iTunes. More than 65,000 videos are posted on YouTube every day. And someone somewhere almost certainly watched the Super Bowl on his cell phone.

With more than 100 million viewers, the Super Bowl is one of television’s few remaining shared experiences, something almost everyone watches at the same time. Maybe Michael Phelps swimming at the Summer Olympics or the finale of “American Idol” also qualify. I’d like to hear your nominations. 

So what does all this mean for professional communicators? 

In some ways it makes our jobs harder. We have more channels to monitor and more competition for people’s attention than ever before. We have to do a better job of training, prepping, and equipping our spokespeople, because screw-ups can live on and on in cyberspace. And we’ve got to be more prepared than ever to respond quickly, effectively, and creatively to disasters, rumors, and PR challenges that didn’t even occur to us a few years ago.  Bad news can go viral faster than you can bathe in a KFC sink.

On the opportunities side of the ledger, we also have more tools at our disposal than ever before. We can respond to negative press overnight or, ideally, even quicker. We can set up dedicated YouTube channels, as Best Buy, Mercedes Benz, Apple and hundreds of other companies have done.  And we can get the word out – from executive speeches to news clips – faster and to a broader audience than ever before, with a few mouse clicks.

Six decades after television took over America’s living rooms, its power to communicate, persuade, and entertain continues to grow.  What are you doing to tap into the power of television in the social media age?

  • Share/Bookmark

Are You “Allowed” to be “Social” at The Office?

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

by Crystal DeGoede*

 

Image: NBC.com

Image: NBC.com

Are you fortunate enough to work at an organization that allows, let alone encourages their employees to access and engage on social networking sites?  I have many friends that work in varying professions and industries and are restricted from accessing sites such as, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. at work.  But that still hasn’t stopped them from updating their status and tweeting during the 9-5 workday. In fact, they are using any type of device they can to access their profiles. If organizations are worried about employee productivity, I would say, this takes even more away from productivity – than if the companies had simply implemented social media policies that allowed for allotted social networking time. But productivity isn’t necessarily the only reason or even the number one reason, for that matter, why companies don’t want their employees logging on.

So why are organizations banning these sites? In a recent survey conducted by British research firm Sophos, 72 percent of companies believe their employees’ activities on social networking sites could endanger their business’s security. Other data backs up that fear: The number of businesses that were targets for spam increased from 33.4 percent in April 2009 to 57 percent in December 2009, a dramatic increase in such a short time period.

Now that Facebook announced it has 400 million users, and is pretty much forcing users to make their profiles open to everyone, the security risk increases. In fact, Sophos, deemed Facebook the most potentially dangerous network, with 60 percent of businesses saying they believe Facebook presents the biggest security risk, significantly ahead of other popular social networks. It’s not just Facebook that poses a threat; I am sure that we all changed our Twitter password when a phishing attack was reported last week.

No matter what your profession is, most of us rely on social media everyday for advertising/marketing mediums, the ability to communicate with clients/prospects, colleagues and peers and most importantly how we get our news. For this reason, some argue that access to social networking sites benefits the company more than it poses a threat.  I would have to agree.

Here at BurrellesLuce, having access to these tools within the past year has made a difference in the way we communicate to our customers and prospects, the amount of information we have obtained and distributed, along with the relationships that have been established, among other things.

A HBR blog post “The Über-Connected Organization: A Mandate for 2010” by Jeanne C Meister and Karie Willyerd breaks-down a survey “WHISTLE – BUT DON’T TWEET – WHILE YOU WORK” conducted by Robert Half International on the importance and benefits of organizations being on social networking sites.

  • Access to social media improves productivity. According to Dr Brent Coker from the Department of Management and Marketing at University of Melbourne in Australia, workers who engage in “Workplace Internet Leisure Browsing” are more productive than those who don’t.
  • Millennials will seek jobs that encourage the use of social media. Those born between 1977 and 1997 — the ones you need to hire to replace the retiring boomers — are networked 24/7 and expect the company to accommodate pervasive connectivity. An Accenture survey of Millennial preferences for various technologies at work found that they prefer to communicate via instant messaging, text messaging, Facebook and RSS feeds.
  • Companies that provide access to social media create a more engaged workforce. Take the case of Cerner Corporation, the health IT firm. In 2009, Cerner implemented uCern, a corporate social network. In 2010, it will extend this social network to its customers and suppliers.

So what does all of this mean?  Social media needs to be embraced now by those organizations that can benefit from it.  Employees need to be aware that using Facebook or Twitter at work is a privilege and rules established to prevent its abuse. And precautions need to be taken to ensure safety. If you are using social networks, strengthen your passwords (PasswordMeter.com is a great resource that can help you assess the security of your passwords) and change them often; don’t click on a link that doesn’t look right or is not from a trusted source. With all parties in agreement and working together, there is nothing to fear. 

What would you do if your company suddenly restricted access social media?  How would you argue that the benefits outweigh the risks?  How has social media helped your overall communication plan? If you are one of those that doesn’t have access, being able to participate in the conversation would benefit the organization you work at? 

*Bio: After graduating from East Carolina University with a Marketing degree in 2005, Crystal DeGoede moved to New Jersey. In her four years as a member of the BurrellesLuce marketing team and through her interaction with peers and clients she has learned what is important or what it takes to develop a career when you are just starting out. She is passionate about continuing to learn about the industry in which we serve and about her career path. By engaging readers on Fresh Ideas Crystal hopes to further develop her social media skills and inspire other “millennials” who are just out of college and/or working in the field of marketing and public relations. Twitter: @cldegoede LinkedIn: Crystal DeGoede Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Meeting and Conversing: Real Life vs. Online

Friday, February 5th, 2010

by Colleen Flood*

Flickr Image: jaffry, grace and eliza

Flickr Image: jaffry, grace and eliza

While attending a luncheon in NYC yesterday, I initially sat at an empty table with a colleague from BurrellesLuce.  We sat across from each since we are often together and had just had a lengthy chat in the cab ride over.  A very nice person came and sat to the left of me and we started chatting.  I learned about her business, what types of clients she worked with, where she lived and where she has lived, among other things. I also met the person to the right of me and learned her interesting story as well.  I found this sort of face-to-face engagement to be very different from my most recent online networking situation.

First, let me start by saying that using social media as a networking tool is all pretty new to me still. (I have yet to network on #journchat or some of the other networking areas available online, but look forward to getting involved in the future.)  However, the Twitter networking event that I did participate in, while interesting and informative, was very fast-paced and, at least for me, also very limited as far as networking opportunities.  I could not really get to know the attendees in the way that I would have liked.  I met some very interesting people online, don’t get me wrong, but did not take much away from this initial experience.  Perhaps I need to network more online or become more immersed in the social media universe to really feel and establish the sort of connections that physical industry events provide. 

I think part of feeling a lack of connection can be attributed to feeling as though my online relationships are not real and I often find myself becoming shy towards my online contacts. (And I am guessing, that I am not alone and that others may feel similar.) I can almost compare this to email vs. picking up the phone.  I like to talk to people so I will often call a colleague or client to converse about a business matter.  However, I find many people have gotten away from this and instead request an email. While email is a wonderful thing and I could not live without it, I have determined that much of the business I do could be done more efficiently and effectively with one simple phone call rather than a string of six emails back and forth.  Maybe I’m old fashioned but a conversation whether it’s face-to-face or on the phone helps me to connect and form much more intimate bonds.   

Even so, I am thankful for the relationships I have made online. I would likely never have met these people if it weren’t for social media events and look forward to meeting them in real life someday.  I do think once I become more immersed in online networking/friendships I will be able to keep up my contacts easily through systems like Twitter.  I’ll know more about people by following them and seeing their updates. In the end, social media can be a very powerful and effective tool – helping me build and maintain relationships – but it is just one tool in a much larger communication toolbox.

What are your thoughts on online vs. real-life networking? Do you think one necessarily replaces the other? How do you establish and maintain good relationships regardless of the medium?

*Bio: Colleen Flood has been a sales consultant with BurrellesLuce for over 12 years and is eager to become a more integrated part of the social-public relations community. She primarily handles agency relations in the New York and New Jersey metro-area. She is not only passionate about work, but also about family, friends, and the Jersey Shore. Twitter: @cgflood LinkedIn: Colleen Flood Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark