Archive for ‘Technology’:


Google Alerts and AP Coverage in a Post-Licensing Agreement Environment

Friday, February 26th, 2010

by Stephen Lawrence*

Picture1

In the wake of my last post, search engine giant Google and the Associated Press (AP) reached an agreement allowing Google to return to hosting AP content.  Did the floodgates then open to overwhelm my inbox with those “author:  Samantha Critchell” Google News Alerts which I had previously set? 

Not exactly. 

During the full calendar week of February 14th – 20th, I received 18 separate alerts containing a total of 27 links. This was a slight improvement over the reporting of 16 alerts and 20 links for the previous period of January 19th – February 2nd. When broken down by source the pattern remains the same:

  • ABC News led with 14 links linking back to AP material hosted on their parent site.
  • Newspaper sites accounted for 10 more.
  • While the remaining three were either foreign or with no hard-copy editions.

The print to web ratio for the prior period, as I found, was evenly matched this week. 

  • Five of the ten Google alerted newspaper articles had a corresponding print presence. 
  • The remaining articles were web exclusives.

One might have expected to see a greater surge of articles since this most recent “experiment” coincided with New York Fashion Week and Ms. Critchell is the AP’s fashion maven.  Her subjects ranged from Marc Jacobs, Zac Posen, and Luca Luca to Naomi Campbell’s Fashion benefit for Haitian relief.  (During the previous period, topics ranged from the Golden Globes to Vera Wang’s designs at previous Winter Olympics.)

A similar Yahoo! News search supplies only six newspaper stories along with a smattering of local TV sites, a couple of which overlapped with the Google Alerts coverage.

To date, our BurrellesLuce readers have located over 80 articles published during that week attributed to Samantha Critchell (this includes the five mentioned earlier). And, these are only the ones relating purely to Fashion Week coverage.  There are an additional 100+ older articles which saw print in newspapers.

While there may well be a number of underlying factors at work here – ranging from other individual licensing agreements to spidering blocks – the raw totals are telling.

This week, we find an 8:1 disparity in Fashion Week coverage, or an 18:1 disparity in subject coverage for this print to web experiment. 

For my purposes, this was but a simple experiment. But would you be willing to subject your client to such uncertainties knowing these possible results?

*Bio: A native of Mesa, Arizona, I graduated from the University of Arizona with a major in Near Eastern Studies. I began my career with BurrellesLuce in 1997 as a reader. As with most readers, I developed a special relationship with my assigned papers – those small town dailies and weeklies of the same flavor that my family had been employed in for two generations. Currently, I hold the position of quality assurance specialist, troubleshooting daily production issues. Outside interests include woodworking, and keeping my wife and dog happy. Twitter: BurrellesLuce; Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Location, Location, Location!

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Can Foursquare Put Your Client On The Map?
Location based social networks, like Yelp, Foursquare and Gowalla are the talk of the industry. A recent #PR20chat included a discussion on how can PR people use these new social networks to help their clients? I’m focusing on Foursquare because it appeals to the kid in all us, by rewarding us with points and badges for checking-in at locations and sharing information. If you check-in at a location more than anyone else, you become the mayor.

Finding Advocates
Social media lesson one – listen to the conversation and embrace your advocates. By encouraging people to check-in often, you can identify

Flickr Image: thinkpanama

Flickr Image: thinkpanama

your top customers or visitors. Many businesses are offering rewards for becoming the “mayor” of their location. I’m guessing your client would like to find an advocate like Jared Fogle, the Subway spokesperson?

Jon Newman of The Hodges Partnership (a BurrellesLuce client) shared ideas on his blog, Jon’s PR 1.5 for encouraging customers to utilize Foursquare when they visit a business. Encouraging positive buzz about a business helps to bring in customers.

Smart Moves
I recently checked-in at a movie theater, and allowed my status to be posted on Twitter. The theater, who was monitoring for mentions of their name, saw my tweet and re-tweeted it. My tweet validated messages they were trying to exhibit, and expanded the audience beyond my Foursquare friends. I’m wondering if there will be an extra reward when I become the mayor?

Christine Ngo recently interviewed Tristan Walker of Foursquare, on Ogilvy’s Fresh Influence blog. Walker shared how some businesses, like Intel, BART, and the Brooklyn Museum are enhancing users’ experiences with tips about locations and promotional tie-ins.

Partnering with Mainstream Media
Foursquare has recently partnered with several media outlets, like Lucky and Bravo. The magazine or cable TV network rewards users with badges or medals when checking-in at locations related to their content, like fashion week, a film or a TV show. Zagat’s new Meet the Mayor series will highlight Foursquare mayors of featured locations. Wouldn’t you want to read the article about you or your friend?

Granted, Foursquare isn’t for every business, but if you rely on people visiting your business, it might be a great way to encourage more foot traffic. Retail outlets, restaurants, hotels, CVBs and other tourist spots, should not ignore this tool.

Have you checked-out Foursquare or another location based social media? How have you incorporated it into your overall communication plan? We’d love to know if any of our BurrellesLuce Fresh Ideas readers is a Foursquare dignitary (Mayor) so please let us know!

  • Share/Bookmark

Shared Experience Becomes Experience We Share

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Bill Hiniker is principal at MessagePoint Communications, a writing and consulting practice specializing in corporate and executive communications.  He blogs at http://www.messagepointblog.blogspot.com/ and can be reached at messagepoint@cox.net.

Instead of being a “shared experience,” TV is quickly becoming “an experience we share.”  That observation, made on a recent episode of NPR’s always-enjoyable Culturetopia podcast, really rings true for me.

I’m a first-generation television kid and am old enough to remember when the television dial was really a dial with 13 numbers. There were just three networks plus an educational channel and an independent channel or two that mostly showed old movies. Miss “The Twilight Zone,” “Ed Sullivan,” “Laugh-In” or, later, “Saturday Night Live” and you risked being left out of the lunchtime conversation. 

That was pretty much the way of the world until the first video recorders began appearing in homes and offices in the 1980s. Almost overnight it became possible to borrow a missed episode of “Cheers” from a coworker who hadn’t forgotten to set his VCR (as long as he didn’t have a Beta machine).  

This opened up a whole new world for communications professionals. Suddenly it became possible to record, copy, and share cassettes of the annual meeting or positive media coverage with employees, customers, and other stakeholders. 

Fast forward a decade or two and digital technology made it possible to post videos on company websites and e-mail links – or even short clips – to your key publics. Even more importantly, you could forward clips of cats playing the piano or bears catching fish to your friends.

 

Technology has continued to advance at warp speed. You can now see most of your favorite shows online or buy them for a couple of bucks on iTunes. More than 65,000 videos are posted on YouTube every day. And someone somewhere almost certainly watched the Super Bowl on his cell phone.

With more than 100 million viewers, the Super Bowl is one of television’s few remaining shared experiences, something almost everyone watches at the same time. Maybe Michael Phelps swimming at the Summer Olympics or the finale of “American Idol” also qualify. I’d like to hear your nominations. 

So what does all this mean for professional communicators? 

In some ways it makes our jobs harder. We have more channels to monitor and more competition for people’s attention than ever before. We have to do a better job of training, prepping, and equipping our spokespeople, because screw-ups can live on and on in cyberspace. And we’ve got to be more prepared than ever to respond quickly, effectively, and creatively to disasters, rumors, and PR challenges that didn’t even occur to us a few years ago.  Bad news can go viral faster than you can bathe in a KFC sink.

On the opportunities side of the ledger, we also have more tools at our disposal than ever before. We can respond to negative press overnight or, ideally, even quicker. We can set up dedicated YouTube channels, as Best Buy, Mercedes Benz, Apple and hundreds of other companies have done.  And we can get the word out – from executive speeches to news clips – faster and to a broader audience than ever before, with a few mouse clicks.

Six decades after television took over America’s living rooms, its power to communicate, persuade, and entertain continues to grow.  What are you doing to tap into the power of television in the social media age?

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Alerts and AP Coverage of Samantha Critchell: A BurrellesLuce Experiment

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

by Stephen Lawrence*

Flickr Image: ClickyKBD

Flickr Image: ClickyKBD

To follow up on my previous post regarding Google’s (non)-coverage of Associated Press content, I opted to take a more controlled approach for this submission.

In other words, I let other people do the leg work for me.

A Google Alert was set up with the specific instructions: “author: Samantha Critchell.”  This would, of course, only return articles attributed to that name.  Why Samantha Critchell?  She’s a leading AP writer covering topics relevant to the cosmetics and fashion industry.  And, as we know, with the AP’s arching distribution of content, brand placement in her work would reach a very wide and diverse potential consumer readership.

Internally, we set up an order to monitor U.S. papers for Associated Press articles penned by Samantha Critchell, which I would monitor.

During a two week period (Jan. 19 – Feb. 2), Google alerted my email inbox 16 times with a total of 20 article links.  In this window, Ms. Critchell penned nine major articles ranging from a Golden Globes fashion round-up and a primer on facial mask products, to a feature on Vera Wang’s figure skating designs for previous Winter Olympic events.

The Alerts broke down as follows:

  • Four of the articles were from ABC News.com, which fell outside of my print coverage experiment
  • Three more were from the Canadian press, which also fell outside of parameters of the U.S. press.
  • Of the remaining 13 domestic newspapers, our readers located the same articles from 11 of their print editions.
  • Regarding that missing duo, one was from a paper which we have simply not yet received as of this time.  While the other, seems to not have published the article in its print edition.  Point goes to Google.

Last week, Yahoo and the Associated Press announced their own licensing agreement to allow the stream of AP content to Yahoo’s sites.  So, to add some additional gist to the topic, I ran a search through Yahoo News with the same subject and date parameters. 

The resulting hits were from eight newspapers and a single website.  Those are fewer results than the totals from Google.

  • Surprisingly, none of the Yahoo! News results corresponded to those of Google News.
  • Four of the eight newspapers articles were found in the print editions by BurrellesLuce readers.
  • Three of the articles did not appear in the print editions of the publications and another article originates from an edition which we have not yet received. Points again to Yahoo.

On the other side of the coin, our BurrellesLuce readers located articles credited to Ms. Critchell in an additional 114 papers published during the same two week period. 

That’s a ten to one loss in coverage for Google. Perhaps this can chiefly be attributed to the search giant’s ongoing wrangling with the Associated Press over compensation, (never mind that it doesn’t cover paid or subscription based sources). Even with the agreement between Yahoo News and the AP, how can the discrepancy in sources and numbers be explained?  And in either case, how might such a potential loss affect your clients in the interim?

*Bio: A native of Mesa, Arizona, I graduated from the University of Arizona with a major in Near Eastern Studies. I began my career with BurrellesLuce in 1997 as a reader. As with most readers, I developed a special relationship with my assigned papers – those small town dailies and weeklies of the same flavor that my family had been employed in for two generations. Currently, I hold the position of quality assurance specialist, troubleshooting daily production issues. Outside interests include woodworking, and keeping my wife and dog happy. Twitter: BurrellesLuce; Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark

Are You “Allowed” to be “Social” at The Office?

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

by Crystal DeGoede*

 

Image: NBC.com

Image: NBC.com

Are you fortunate enough to work at an organization that allows, let alone encourages their employees to access and engage on social networking sites?  I have many friends that work in varying professions and industries and are restricted from accessing sites such as, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. at work.  But that still hasn’t stopped them from updating their status and tweeting during the 9-5 workday. In fact, they are using any type of device they can to access their profiles. If organizations are worried about employee productivity, I would say, this takes even more away from productivity – than if the companies had simply implemented social media policies that allowed for allotted social networking time. But productivity isn’t necessarily the only reason or even the number one reason, for that matter, why companies don’t want their employees logging on.

So why are organizations banning these sites? In a recent survey conducted by British research firm Sophos, 72 percent of companies believe their employees’ activities on social networking sites could endanger their business’s security. Other data backs up that fear: The number of businesses that were targets for spam increased from 33.4 percent in April 2009 to 57 percent in December 2009, a dramatic increase in such a short time period.

Now that Facebook announced it has 400 million users, and is pretty much forcing users to make their profiles open to everyone, the security risk increases. In fact, Sophos, deemed Facebook the most potentially dangerous network, with 60 percent of businesses saying they believe Facebook presents the biggest security risk, significantly ahead of other popular social networks. It’s not just Facebook that poses a threat; I am sure that we all changed our Twitter password when a phishing attack was reported last week.

No matter what your profession is, most of us rely on social media everyday for advertising/marketing mediums, the ability to communicate with clients/prospects, colleagues and peers and most importantly how we get our news. For this reason, some argue that access to social networking sites benefits the company more than it poses a threat.  I would have to agree.

Here at BurrellesLuce, having access to these tools within the past year has made a difference in the way we communicate to our customers and prospects, the amount of information we have obtained and distributed, along with the relationships that have been established, among other things.

A HBR blog post “The Über-Connected Organization: A Mandate for 2010” by Jeanne C Meister and Karie Willyerd breaks-down a survey “WHISTLE – BUT DON’T TWEET – WHILE YOU WORK” conducted by Robert Half International on the importance and benefits of organizations being on social networking sites.

  • Access to social media improves productivity. According to Dr Brent Coker from the Department of Management and Marketing at University of Melbourne in Australia, workers who engage in “Workplace Internet Leisure Browsing” are more productive than those who don’t.
  • Millennials will seek jobs that encourage the use of social media. Those born between 1977 and 1997 — the ones you need to hire to replace the retiring boomers — are networked 24/7 and expect the company to accommodate pervasive connectivity. An Accenture survey of Millennial preferences for various technologies at work found that they prefer to communicate via instant messaging, text messaging, Facebook and RSS feeds.
  • Companies that provide access to social media create a more engaged workforce. Take the case of Cerner Corporation, the health IT firm. In 2009, Cerner implemented uCern, a corporate social network. In 2010, it will extend this social network to its customers and suppliers.

So what does all of this mean?  Social media needs to be embraced now by those organizations that can benefit from it.  Employees need to be aware that using Facebook or Twitter at work is a privilege and rules established to prevent its abuse. And precautions need to be taken to ensure safety. If you are using social networks, strengthen your passwords (PasswordMeter.com is a great resource that can help you assess the security of your passwords) and change them often; don’t click on a link that doesn’t look right or is not from a trusted source. With all parties in agreement and working together, there is nothing to fear. 

What would you do if your company suddenly restricted access social media?  How would you argue that the benefits outweigh the risks?  How has social media helped your overall communication plan? If you are one of those that doesn’t have access, being able to participate in the conversation would benefit the organization you work at? 

*Bio: After graduating from East Carolina University with a Marketing degree in 2005, Crystal DeGoede moved to New Jersey. In her four years as a member of the BurrellesLuce marketing team and through her interaction with peers and clients she has learned what is important or what it takes to develop a career when you are just starting out. She is passionate about continuing to learn about the industry in which we serve and about her career path. By engaging readers on Fresh Ideas Crystal hopes to further develop her social media skills and inspire other “millennials” who are just out of college and/or working in the field of marketing and public relations. Twitter: @cldegoede LinkedIn: Crystal DeGoede Facebook: BurrellesLuce

  • Share/Bookmark